JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 18, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Corrección del Auto 629/18.

Teniendo en cuenta que el despacho de la Magistrada Ponente constató que los folios 1 y 2 del auto de la referencia no corresponden al texto original del que fue estudiado y aprobado por la Sala Plena de la Corporación, en tanto se incurrió en un error al adjuntar dos páginas que no corresponden a los antecedentes verdaderamente analizados y decididos, se procede a corregir dicho proveído reemplazando los mencionados folios.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 21 de agosto de 2018, proferido por la Magistrada Ponente Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Daniel Mauricio Perez Linares contra el inciso 4deg (parcial) del articulo 130 de la Ley 270 de 1996 Ley Estatutaria de administracion de Justicia, con radicado D-12817.
  2. Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
  3. Publiquese y Cumplase,
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que a traves de la Secretaria General se NOTIFIQUE el presente proveido al ciudadano Daniel Mauricio Perez Linares.
  5. Notifiquese, publiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.